Original Research
Job insecurity: Mediator or moderator of the relationship between type of contract and various outcomes?
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology | Vol 31, No 4 | a211 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v31i4.211
| © 2005 Nele De Cuyper, Hans De Witte
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 29 October 2005 | Published: 29 October 2005
Submitted: 29 October 2005 | Published: 29 October 2005
About the author(s)
Nele De Cuyper, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, BelgiumHans De Witte, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Full Text:
PDF (135KB)Abstract
Research on the consequences of job insecurity among temporary workers has been largely exploratory. This study investigates whether job insecurity either mediates or moderates the relationship between type of contract (temporary versus permanent) and its outcomes. It extends previous research by including a wide range of outcomes (job satisfaction, engagement, organisational commitment, trust, general health, irritation, turnover intention, performance, and positive work life interference), most of which have not yet been considered in this context. Results (N = 656) point to the moderating role of job insecurity, however only for outcomes reflecting immediate reactions. Implications for future research are discussed.
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 5227Total article views: 11200
Crossref Citations
1. Does job insecurity hinder innovative work behaviour? A threat rigidity perspective
Anahí Van Hootegem, Wendy Niesen, Hans De Witte
Creativity and Innovation Management vol: 28 issue: 1 first page: 19 year: 2019
doi: 10.1111/caim.12271